Skip to content
DOSLSkyline
Contact us

Adjust maadbeda.

Brochure nodbeda. Read the record.

A free account

  • Search every registered project by name, survey or RERA number
  • Save projects to My list and your own lists
  • The map and every layer, free with your account
  • No card needed

It costs nothing. Your email only signs you in.

DOSL

Your free account

No password, no card, no commitment. We email a code that works once, simply.

No spam calls. We never ask for your phone number.

Built from 100+ public records and registers, K-RERA filings first · No broker, no listing fees

Products

DOSL SkylineDOSL PlotlineFor lenders

Use cases

Collateral checksInvestmentHomebuyers

DOSL

How it worksBlogPricing
Contact us

Adjust maadbeda.

Brochure nodbeda. Read the record.

A free account

  • Search every registered project by name, survey or RERA number
  • Save projects to My list and your own lists
  • The map and every layer, free with your account
  • No card needed

It costs nothing. Your email only signs you in.

DOSL

Your free account

No password, no card, no commitment. We email a code that works once, simply.

No spam calls. We never ask for your phone number.

Built from 100+ public records and registers, K-RERA filings first · No broker, no listing fees

As of 28 Oct 2026

Apartment · Ulsoor · head to head

HM Gladiolus vs Nitesh Logos

Both are apartment projects in Ulsoor, so the location argument is largely settled and what remains is the paperwork. Everything below is filed with Karnataka RERA or researched from the builder, with the source named on each row.

Where they actually differ

  • Nearest BWSSB main: HM Gladiolus is ahead, ~27 m: a trunk main runs past the site against ~363 m to the nearest trunk main.
  • Density: Nitesh Logos is ahead, 23 units/acre against 30 units/acre.
  • DOSL Score: HM Gladiolus is ahead, 72 / 100 (B+) against 64 / 100 (B).

Side by side

HM Gladiolus compared with Nitesh Logos across price, schedule, builder record and land
 HM GladiolusNitesh Logos
DOSL Score72 / 100 (B+)64 / 100 (B)
Price₹14,350–17,950/sqftbuilder quote, super-built-up, Mar 2026 · 7 months old, reconfirm with the builder₹19,500/sqftresale ask, Jun 2026
Quoted price per sqftcharged on saleable area, so not directly comparable between projects₹16,150–
Unit sizes2,630–2,840 sqft4,290–6,700 sqft
StatusReady to moveReady to move
CompletionCompletedCompleted
Builder overdue sharecity-wide RERA record for the promoter group, not just this project–100% of 11 filings
Builder average slip–53.6 months
Units declared3016
Densitylower is more open space per home30 units/acre23 units/acre
Nearest BWSSB mainproximity is infrastructure, not a connection~27 m: a trunk main runs past the site~363 m to the nearest trunk main
Disamenities nearbylandfill, sewage plant, quarry, crematorium, prison or substation close enough to matterlandfill 1.5 kmnone within range

DOSL Score, pillar by pillar

DOSL Score pillars compared
PillarHM GladiolusNitesh Logos
Land & title20.0 / 2220.0 / 22
Execution13.0 / 2213.0 / 22
Builder standing11.0 / 186.0 / 18
Financial discipline8.0 / 138.0 / 13
Market signal15.0 / 1512.0 / 15
Appreciation outlook5.0 / 105.0 / 10

Each project page lists the reason behind every deduction.

Read either one in full

This page ranks two projects on filed and researched data, not on suitability. It cannot see the things that decide most purchases: which floor, which facing, how the approach road behaves in a downpour, what the neighbours are like. Visit both, in the monsoon if you can, and verify against certified records before you transact.